博碩士論文 etd-0112116-172655 詳細資訊


姓名 劉至豪 (Chih-Hao Liu) 電子信箱 trickerthegod@hotmail.com
學號 M10101002 論文著作權 作者與指導教授共同擁有
系所名稱(中) 工業管理系 系所名稱(英) Department of Industrial Management
學年度 / 學期 104學年度第1學期 學位 碩士 (Master)
論文名稱(中) 運用多項行為理論與模型為基礎探討學生使用數位學習系統之行為意向-以使用Blackboard平台後轉至Moodle平台為例
論文名稱(英) An Investigation of Students’ Intention in Using E-learning with Behavior Models: a Migration Case from Blackboard to Moodle
檔案 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 校內立即公開、校外立即公開
論文種類 碩士論文
論文語文別 / 頁數 英文 / 70
統計 已被瀏覽 121 次,被下載 35 次
關鍵字(中)
  • 結構方程模型
  • 計畫行為理論
  • 整合性科技接受模式
  • 技術接受模型
  • 電子教學平台
  • 線上學習系統
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technolo
  • Theory of Planned Behavior
  • Structural Equation Modeling
  • Moodle
  • Blackboard
  • Technology Acceptance Model
  • E-Learning
  • 摘要(中) 本研究試圖以科技接受模型(Technology Acceptance Model)、計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior)、和整合性科技接受與應用模式(Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology)為基礎,延伸發展提出一概念模型探討學生對於使用電子學習系統之意圖,並以一選定大學內從原先Blackboard平台改用為Moodle平台之遷移為例。本研究提出之模型中最初考慮共有10個因素:認知易用性(PEOU)、感知有用性(PU)、態度(ATT)、主觀規範(SN)、知覺行為控制(PBC)、有利條件(FC)、自我效能感(SE)、感知使用者介面設計(PUID)、感知互動性(PI)和行為意圖(BI),和15個假設來衡量學生在從Blackboard平台換至Moodle平台時使用電子學習系統的使用意圖。
    本研究藉由線上問卷及於課堂上發放實體問卷的方式蒐集所需的資料,接著使用結構方程模型(SEM)分析。結果顯示,該所選大學在2004年從Blackboard線上平台更換至Moodle平台的同時產生了些許使用者適應上的問題。本研究後段根據先前結果提出一個新的模型,除去了兩個較為不顯著的因素及多加上一個假設,分析結果得知直接影響使用意圖(BI)最甚者為知覺行為控制(PBC)因素。於本研究的發現可提供未來的電子學習系統設計參考的方向,予以提高其操作的性能。
    摘要(英) This study tries to investigate students’ intention in using e-learning systems with a migration case from Blackboard platform to Moodle in one selected university by applying a proposed extended conceptual model based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as the approach. A total of 10 factors namely Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), Attitude (ATT), Subjective Norms (SN), Perceived Behavior Control (PBC), Facilitating Condition (FC), Self-Efficacy (SE), Perceived User Interface Design (PUID), Perceived Interactivity (PI), and Behavior Intention (BI), and 15 hypotheses are originally considered in the proposed model to measure students’ intention to use e-learning system when migrating from Blackboard to Moodle system. The present study distributed web-based questionnaires online and hard copies in classes to gather the necessary information. A structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was then employed to analyze the originally proposed model. Results showed that the selected university brought an adaptation issue when conducting the process of migrating Blackboard system to Moodle system since 2004. Study further proposed a new model by eliminating two insignificant factors and adding one hypothesis. The result revealed that PBC factor has the most directly influential effect on BI. The finding in present study can be considered the suggestions for future e-learning system design to enhance its performance.
    論文目次 Abstract
    中文摘要
    Table of Contents
    List of Figures
    List of Tables
    Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Objectives
    1.3 Research Outline
    Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Blackboard Learning System
    2.2 Moodle Learning System
    2.3 Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
    2.4 Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
    2.5 Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
    2.6 Tools for Assessing the Reliability of Scales
    2.7 Path Model
    2.8 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
    2.9 Model Fit
    Chapter 3 Research Methodology
    3.1 Research Model and Hypotheses
    3.2 Model Development
    3.2.1 Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)
    3.2.2 Perceived Usefulness (PU)
    3.2.3 Attitude (ATT)
    3.2.4 Subjective Norms (SN)
    3.2.5 Perceived Behavior Control (PBC)
    3.2.6 Facilitating Condition (FC)
    3.2.7 Self-Efficacy (SE)
    3.2.8 Perceived User Interface Design (PUID)
    3.2.9 Perceived Interactivity (PI)
    3.2.10 Behavior Intention (BI)
    3.3 Factors-proposed Model Hypotheses
    3.4 Questionnaire Design
    Chapter 4 Results and Discussion
    4.1 Questionnaire Results and Evaluation
    4.1.1 Evaluation of Questionnaire Reliability and Validity
    4.1.2 Model Results
    4.2 Model Revision
    4.2.1 Evaluation of Questionnaire Reliability and Validity
    4.2.2 Model Results
    Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future Study
    5.1 Conclusion
    5.2 Research Limitations
    5.3 Future Study and Suggestions
    References
    Appendix
    參考文獻 [1] S. Acharya. (2014). ITU releases annual global ICT data and ICT Development Index country rankings. Available: http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2014/68.aspx#.VjozA7crIdX
    [2] D. Rowinski. (2015). Survey: 1 In 6 Internet Users Own A Smartwatch Or Fitness Tracker. Available: http://arc.applause.com/2015/01/12/survey-1-6-people-smartwatch-fitness-tracker/
    [3] D. Bouhnik and T. Marcus, "Interaction in distance-learning courses.," Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology, vol. 57, pp. 299-305, 2006.
    [4] S.-S. Liaw, H.-M. Huang, and G.-D. Chen, "An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems.," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 23, pp. 1906-1920, 2007.
    [5] R. T. Raab, W. W. Ellis, and B. R. Abdon, "Multisectoral partnerships in e-learning A potential force for improved human capital development in the Asia Pacific.," Internet and Higher Education, vol. 4, pp. 217-229, 2002.
    [6] P. G. Shotsberger, "The human touch: Synchronous communication in web-based learning.," Educational Technology, vol. 40, pp. 53-56, 2000.
    [7] A. Casamayor, A. Amandi, and M. Campo, "Intelligent assistance for teachers in collaborative e-learning environments," Computers& Education, vol. 53, pp. 1147-1154, 2009.
    [8] A. M. Payne, J. E. Stephenson, W. B. Morris, H. G. Tempest, A. Mileham, and D. K. Griffin, "The Use of an E-Learning Constructivist Solution in Workplace Learning," International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 39, pp. 548-553, 2009.
    [9] H.-C. Chu, M.-J. Liao, T.-Y. Chen, C.-J. Lin, and Y.-M. Chen, "Learning case adaptation for problem-oriented e-learning on mathematics teaching for students with mild disabilities," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, pp. 1269-1281, 2011.
    [10] S. Cottrell and J. H. Donaldson, "Exploring the opinions of registered nurses working in a clinical transfusion environment on the contribution of e-learning to personal learning and clinical practice: Results of a small scale educational research study," Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 13, pp. 221-227, 2013.
    [11] M. Abdelaziz, S. S. Kamel, O. Karam, and A. Abdelrahman, "Evaluation of E-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing.," Teaching and Learning in Nursing, vol. 6, pp. 50-58, 2011.
    [12] S.-S. Liaw, "Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system " Computer & Education, vol. 51, pp. 864-873, 2008.
    [13] P. Bradford, M. Porciello, N. Balkon, and D. Backus, "THE BLACKBOARD LEARNING SYSTEM: THE BE ALL AND END ALL IN EDUCATIONAL INSTRUCTION?," Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 35, pp. 301-314, 2007.
    [14] A. Trotter. (2008). Blackboard vs. Moodle. Available: http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2008/06/09/01moodle.h02.html
    [15] C. Costa, H. Alvelosa, and L. Teixeira, "The Use of Moodle e-learning Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University," Procedia Technology, vol. 5, pp. 334-343, 2012.
    [16] iSpring. (2015). Moodle vs BlackBoard - That is the Question. Available: http://www.ispringsolutions.com/blog/moodle-vs-blackboard/
    [17] F. D. Davis, "Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, 1989.
    [18] F.-C. Tung, S.-C. Chang, and C.-M. Chou, "An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry," International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 77, pp. 324-335, 2008.
    [19] K. Mathieson, "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research vol. 2, pp. 173-191, 1991.
    [20] V. Venkatesh, "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research vol. 11, pp. 342-365, 2000.
    [21] A. H. Segars and V. Grover, "Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis," MIS Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 517-525, 1993.
    [22] W. W. Chin and P. A. Todd, "On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution," MIS Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 237-246, 1995.
    [23] W. J. Doll, A. Hendrickson, and X. Deng, "Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multi-group invariance analysis," Decision Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 839-869, 1998.
    [24] B. Šumak, M. Heričko, and M. Pušnik, "A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 27, pp. 2067-2077, 2011.
    [25] I. Ajzen, "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991.
    [26] S. F. Persada, S.-C. Lin, R. Nadlifatin, and M. Razif, "INVESTIGATING THE CITIZENS’ INTENTION LEVEL IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION THROUGH AN EXTENDED THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR MODEL," Global NEST Journal, vol. 17, 2015.
    [27] S.-C. Lin, R. Nadlifatin, and S. F. Persada, "An Investigation of Students' Experience Towards Blackboard Learning System: a Behavioral Perspective Based on Extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)," presented at the ICSSI, Taipei, Taiwan, 2014.
    [28] I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, "Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour," 1980.
    [29] W. Perla, "Reasoned Action and Planned Behavio," Middle range Theories: Application to Nursing Research, pp. 125-147, 2004.
    [30] I. Ajzen, "Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior," ed. New York: Open University Press, 2005.
    [31] M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, 1975.
    [32] A. Colman, "Theory of Reasoned Action," A Dictionary of Psychology, 2015.
    [33] I. Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior.," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991.
    [34] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 425-478, 2003.
    [35] N. D. Oye, N. Iahad, and N. Z. A. Rahim, "The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians," Education and Information Technologies vol. 19, pp. 251-270, 2014.
    [36] C. Fornell and D. Larcker, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, pp. 39-50, 1981.
    [37] J. Cheon, S. Lee, S. M. Crooks, and J. Song, "An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior," Computer & Education, vol. 59, pp. 1054-1064, 2012.
    [38] R. Nadlifatin, M. Razif, S.-C. Lin, S. F. Persada, and P. F. Belgiawan, "An assessment model of Indonesian citizens' intention to participate on environmental impact assessment (EIA): a behavioral perspective," Procedia Environmental Sciences, vol. 28, pp. 3-10, 2015.
    [39] J. Chin and S.-C. Lin, "Investigating Users’ Perspectives in Building Energy Management System with an extension of Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study in Indonesian Manufacturing Companies," in The Third Information Systems International Conference, 2015.
    [40] D. Child, The Essentials of Factor Analysis, 3rd ed., 2006.
    [41] J. J. Albright and H. M. Park, "Title," unpublished|.
    [42] C. S. Lin, S. Wu, and R. J. Tsai, "Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context," Information & Management, vol. 42, pp. 683-693, 2005.
    [43] L. J. Cronbach, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, vol. 16, pp. 297-334, 1951.
    [44] D. George and P. Mallery, SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference., 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2003.
    [45] Z. Sheng, Z. Jue, and T. Weiwei, "Extending TAM for Online Learning Systems: An Intrinsic Motivation Perspective," TsingHua Science & Technology, vol. 13, pp. 312-317, 2008.
    [46] C.-S. Ong, J.-Y. Laia, and Y.-S. Wang, "Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies," Information & Management, vol. 41, pp. 795-804, 2004.
    [47] M. Masrom, "Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning," presented at the 12th International Conference on Education, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, 2007.
    [48] J. C. Nunally and I. H. Bernstein, "Psychometric Theory," Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, vol. 17, pp. 275-280, 1999.
    [49] M. S. B. Yusoff, "A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Study on the Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire among Malaysian medical students," Education in Medicine Journal, vol. 3, pp. e44-e53, 2011.
    [50] S.-I. Cheng, "Comparisons of Competing Models between Attitudinal Loyalty and Behavioral Loyalty," International Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 2, pp. 149-166, 2011.
    [51] BEING, "composite reliability-the reliability of each composite," in THE ONLY THING UNCHANGED IS CHANGE, ed, 2007.
    [52] S. Wright, "The Method of Path Coefficients," The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 5, pp. 161-215, 1934.
    [53] S. Wright, "Correlation and Causation," Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. XX, pp. 557-585, 1921.
    [54] K. L. Wuensch. (2015, 2013/02/30). An Introduction to Path Analysis. Available: http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/MV/SEM/Path.pdf
    [55] R. H. Hoyle, Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. California, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 1995.
    [56] R. A. Sánchez and A. D. Hueros, "Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 1632-1640, 2010.
    [57] J. J. Hox and T. M. Bechger, "An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling," Family Science Review, vol. 11, pp. 354-373, 2007.
    [58] Y. Reisinger and L. Turner, "Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: application in tourism," Tourism Management, vol. 20, pp. 71-88, 1999.
    [59] K.-H. Yuan, "Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics," Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 40, pp. 115-148, 2005.
    [60] D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. R. Mullen, "Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit," Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, vol. 6, pp. 53-60, 2008.
    [61] L. T. Hu and P. M. Bentler, "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives," Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 6, pp. 1-55, 1999.
    [62] P. Barrett, "Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit," Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 42, pp. 815-824, 2007.
    [63] G. Rasch, Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
    [64] S.-C. Lin, S. F. Persada, and R. Nadlifatin, "A study of student behavior in accepting the Blackboard Learning System: A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach," presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Conference, 2014.
    [65] H. Baumgartner and C. Hombur, "Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review.," International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 13, pp. 139-161, 1996.
    [66] M. Shevlin and J. N. Miles, "Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis," Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 25, pp. 85-90, 1998.
    [67] C.-L. Hsu and J. C.-C. Lin, "Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation," Information & Management, vol. 45, pp. 65-74, 2008.
    [68] A. H. Seyal, M. N. A. Rahman, and M. M. Rahim, "Determinants of academic use of the Internet: A structural equation model," Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 21, pp. 71-86, 2002.
    [69] L. R. Tucker and C. Lewis, "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, vol. 38, pp. 1-10, 1973.
    [70] P. M. Bentler, "Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 107, pp. 238-246, 1990.
    [71] B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics New York: Allyn and Bacon, 2007.
    [72] R. B. Kline, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press, 2005.
    [73] P. M. Bentler and D. G. Bonett, "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 88, pp. 588-606, 1980.
    [74] K. G. Jöreskog. (1999). What is the interpretation of R2? Available: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/WhatistheinterpretationofR2.pdf
    [75] N. Kripanont, "Examininga Technology Acceptance Model of Internet Usage by Academic within Thai Business Schools," Doctor of Philosophy, School of Information Systems Faculty of Business and Law, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia, 2007.
    [76] J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Third ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
    [77] K.-M. Lin, "E-Learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experinece," Computers & Education, vol. 56, pp. 515-526, 2011.
    [78] R. Cheung and D. Vogel, "Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning," Computer & Education, vol. 63, pp. 160-175, 2013.
    [79] A. Bandura, "Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency," American Psychologist, vol. 37, 1982.
    [80] M. Gong, Y. Xu, and Y. Yu, "An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning," Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 15, pp. 365-374, 2004.
    [81] I. Ajzen, Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior: Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988.
    [82] D. Jong and T.-S. Wang, "Student Acceptance of Web-based Learning System " Nanchang, P. R. China, pp. 533-536, 2009.
    [83] H. Motaghian, A. Hassanzadeh, and D. K. Moghadam, "Factors Affecting University Instructors' Adoption of Web-Based Learning Systems: Case Study of Iran," Computer & Education, vol. 61, pp. 158-167, 2013.
    [84] R. Nadlifatin, S.-C. Lin, S. F. Persada, and M. Razif, "Investigating the Behavior of Citizens to Use ICT in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)," ISICO 2015, 2015.
    [85] I. Ajzen, "Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior.," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 665-683, 2002.
    [86] B. Kidwell and R. D. Jewell, "An Examination of Perceived Behavioral Control: Internal and External Influences on Intention," Psychology & Marketing, vol. 27, pp. 625-642, 2003.
    [87] S. Rao and I. Troshani, "A Conceptual Framework and Propositions for the Acceptance of Mobile Services " Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research vol. 2, pp. 61-73, 2007.
    [88] D. J. Terry, C. Gallois, and M. McCamish, The Theory of Reasoned Action: Its Application to AIDS-preventive Behaviour Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1993.
    [89] R. L. Thompson, C. A. Higgins, and J. M. Howell, "Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization," MIS Quarterly, vol. 15, pp. 125-143, 1991.
    [90] K. Ghalandari, "The Effect of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions on Acceptance of E-Banking Services in Iran: the Moderating Role of Age and Gender," Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 12, pp. 801-807, 2012.
    [91] C. J. Armitage, M. Conner, J. Loach, and D. Willets, "Different perceptions of control: Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to legal and illegal drug use," Basic Applied Social Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 310-316, 1999.
    [92] R. Povey, M. Conner, P. Sparks, R. James, and R. Sheperd, "Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to two dietary behaviors: Roles of perceived control and self-efficacy," British Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 5, 2000.
    [93] A. S. R. Manstead and S. A. M. v. Eekelen, "Distinguishing between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic intentions and behaviors," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 28, pp. 1375-1392, 1998.
    [94] J.-C. Hong, M.-Y. Hwang, H.-F. Hsu, W.-T. Wong, and M.-Y. Chen, "Applying the technology acceptance model in a study of the factors affecting usage of the Taiwan digital archives system," Computer & Education, vol. 57, pp. 2086-2094, 2011.
    [95] B. Myers, S. E. Hudson, and R. Pausch, "Past, Present, and Future of User Interface Software Tools," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 3-28, 2000.
    [96] V. Cho, T. C. E. Cheng, and W. M. J. Lai, "The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools," Computer & Education, vol. 53, pp. 216-227, 2009.
    [97] M.-H. Hsu and C.-M. Chiu, "Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour," Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 23, pp. 359-373, 2004.
    [98] B. L. Massey and M. R. Levy, "Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia," Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 76, pp. 138-151, 1999.
    [99] G. Wu, "The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in The Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward The Website," Journal of Interactive Advertising, vol. 5, pp. 29-39, 2005.
    [100] I.-L. Wu and J.-L. Chen, "An extension ofTrust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption ofon-line tax: An empirical study," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 62, pp. 784-808, 2005.
    [101] G. Sideridis, P. Simos, A. Papanicolaou, and J. Fletcher, "Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations," Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 74, pp. 733-758, 2014.
    [102] R. C. MacCallum, M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara, "Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling," Psychological Methods, vol. 1, pp. 130-149, 1996.
    [103] R. C. MacCallum and S. Hong, "Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI," Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 32, pp. 193-210, 1997.
    [104] R. C. MacCallum, T. Lee, and M. W. Browne, "The issue of isopower in power analysis for tests of structural equation models," Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 17, pp. 23-41, 2010.
    [105] H.-J. Kim, M. Mannino, and R. J. Nieschwietz, "Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: Impact of technology features and complexity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems Research, vol. 10, pp. 214-228, 2009.
    [106] S.-C. Lin, S. F. Persada, R. Nadlifatin, H. Y. Tsia, and C.-H. Chu, "Exploring the influential factors of manufacturers’ initial intention in applying for the green mark ecolabel in Taiwan," International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, vol. 2, pp. 173-191, 2015.
    [107] K. Mathieson, "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, vol. 2, pp. 173-191, 1991.
    [108] S. Taylor and P. Todd, "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, vol. 6, pp. 144-176, 1995b.
    [109] D. Osepashvili, "The Role of E-Learning in Modern Media Education," presented at the International Conference 'The Future of Education', Florence, Italy, 2011.
    指導教授/口試委員
  • 林樹強 - 指導教授
  • 江行全 - 委員
  • 吳克振 - 委員
  • 繳交日期 2016-01-13


    基本檢索 | 進階查詢 | 瀏覽檢索 | 檢索歷史 | 主頁

    如有任何問題請與國立臺灣科技大學圖書館聯繫